Tag: privacy

Facebook’s New ‘Timeline’ Layout – Convenient Social Tool or Privacy Destroyer?

Facebook FSometime over the next few weeks, the social networking site we all love to hate will be getting a major facelift. Forget all those little minor changes that have been popping up with increasing frequency over the past year or so that everyone loves to bitch and moan about, they’re nothing compared to what Mark Zuckerberg has in store for us this time around.

As most of you already know, especially you early-adopters and developers, Facebook will be converting all profiles into a brand new “timeline” layout which will archive pretty much everything you’ve ever done on Facebook since the very moment you joined the site. (Which I’m sure some of you area already regretting.) While this new timeline layout could actually prove not to suck giant donkey balls, there are some features and serious new privacy concerns you should really be aware of before your new timeline profile goes live. Keep in mind anyone you’ve allowed access to your profile will be able to see everything you’ve ever done on Facebook… ever. There are those of us who that idea simply horrifies. Perhaps you have overshared in the past and have been lulled into a false sense of security knowing no one will ever see those stupid posts again. Perhaps you have some embarrassing photos you would rather people not have access to. Perhaps you are simply like me, and you make it a very personal habit of constantly updating your privacy settings so as few people in the general public can see anything you don’t want them to. (Which in and of itself is probably a fallacy anyway, but you can’t blame us for trying.) Here is a screenshot of what the new layout will look like:

Facebook Timeline

An Example of the New Timline Layout

Now at first glance it doesn’t look so bad, right? It could even prove useful. It even gives you options you never had before to mark statuses in a plethora of different ways, share photos from way back, tag things you never did before… but as I said before, it also makes everything you’ve ever done on Facebook easily accessible to anyone you freely share with. Personally, this makes me uncomfortable and as soon as this new layout goes live I will be furiously combing the site for any changed privacy settings and adjusting them all to the “don’t show a goddamn thing to anybody without expressly consulting me” level. However, many of you may actually like this new layout. It’s certainly not hard on the eyes and gives people a chance to share things in ways previously unavailable on Facebook, which I thought was impossible, but way to go Zuckerberg, you’ve given the general public a whole buttload of brand new ways to ignorantly expose themselves once again.

Anyway, as you can probably tell, I’m a little bit biased to this whole operation going down. As guilty as I am of sharing completely inane and stupid details about my daily life, my cats, my hatred of hipsters, and sometimes even my bowel movements, I still don’t particularly like the idea of anyone on my friends list being able to comb through my entire Facebook history with a few clicks of the mouse. So, with all that said, I’ve compiled a list of informative and also cautionary articles you might want to have a look at before you eagerly embrace or furiously demonize this newest huge change to Facebook. I suggest you at least read some of them and absorb the knowledge the developers have amassed.

[PC World Article on the New Features and Privacy Concerns of "Timeline"]

[GigaOM Article Discussing the Benefits and Hazards of the New Features]

[Digital Trends Article Including a FAQ About the New Timeline Layout]

[Very Short FaceCrooks Article About Privacy Issues with the New Layout]

[PC Magazine Article "10 Things You Should Know About Facebook Timeline"]

Share with caution, my friends. Now more than ever. Or just migrate to Google+ (refer to SourBrains.Org migration article [HERE] for how-to guide.) Or, just wait for November 5th in hopes that the Anonymous hacker collective will in fact destroy all data on the Facebook servers one and for all. Guess we’ll see, huh?

 

 

 

[r.b.]

How The New ‘Protecting Children’ Bill Puts You At Risk | ZDNet

image

m.zdnet.com/blog/violetblue/how-the-new-8216protecting-children-bill-puts-you-at-risk/590?tag=content%3Bfeature-roto

This is a disgusting move by the House Reps to build a database of everything you do online. This bill was recently passed and desperately needs to be fought by all of us. Under the guise of protecting children from pornography, something which the bill doesnt actually do, internet service providers are now required to keep record of everything you do online, instead of destroying that data after two weeks. So now, there will be a giant database of everything you’ve ever done along with all of your personal information that is just waiting to be hacked into, stolen, and broadcasted over hacker and identity theft networks overseas. Or even worse, this information can be requested by nearly any lawyer and all of your personal information online can be displayed for everyone to see if you happen to find yourself in the courts system. The potential for misuse and mishandling of this information is astounding. Let’s shut this bill down by signing petitions and writing to our representatives that we do not support this violation of our rights to privacy!

Florida Governor OK’s Drug Screens for Welfare Recipients – Thousands of Crackheads Weep in Despair

Florida Drug Test

One tiny step closer to eliminating crack-babies...?

I have to admit that honestly, I’m 100% thoroughly and completely impressed with, and totally behind this action. While I strongly believe that what you do with or put in your own body behind closed doors is your own damn business and nobody else’s, certainly not the fucking government’s, I have to wholeheartedly applaud the fact that someone in some kind of position of actual power is finally saying “Hey! Let’s not make taxpayers supply this chick’s crack rocks, or this dude’s black tar, or this girl’s meth, or that guy’s ganja! Or any other of the cornucopia of abused drugs readily available to anyone with the cash!” Okay, so maybe he didn’t say it quite like that, but the fact remains; this is an incredibly good idea. It’s bad enough people are abusing the welfare system all across the United States, but it’s even worse when mothers are buying cocaine instead of feeding their however many possibly illegitimate children. Or fathers are spending their welfare checks on Oxycontin and Budweiser because they hate themselves and don’t want to pay their child support. (Granted these are pretty worst-case scenarios, but honestly, how accurate do you think they probably are?)

Well no more, says the Governor of Florida. He signed a measure that will take effect July 1st which will require all adults requesting welfare assistance to submit to drug screening. While I personally am a registered Democrat, I can’t say I agree with Democrats’ attack on the legislature, calling it unconstitutional and a blatant invasion of privacy. I’m sorry, but if you’re suckling at the tit of the state government for free fucking cash to get you by, that government tit has every right to say “Hey jackass, don’t spend this on crack.” However, hard drugs such as cocaine and heroin’s metabolites only stay in the urine for 2-4 days. I’m relatively sure I’m safe in assuming the state is not going to put out the kind of money to test in more expensive, more thorough ways for drug use any further back. I also find it hard, to near impossible to believe that hardcore crack fiends and heroin junkies could go the 2-4 days it would require for the chemicals to leave their system without exhibiting a plethora of symptoms that would be incredibly obvious and suspicious to even the most idiotic of observers. So while I say that I don’t think this is going to really solve any greater drug problems beyond cutting off state-funded drug addictions, I think it’s a goddamn good nudge in the right direction for the welfare system. So props to Florida for being niggardly with their welfare money. Yes, I used the word niggardly. Look it up.

You can find the [full article on CNN's website here.]

Agree? Disagree? What do you think?

 

 

 

[r.b.]
Stop censorshipStop CISPA